Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin X Multi Z vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Kumho (65%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Michelin X Multi Z has B wet grip rating, whereas 79% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.
| # | Michelin X Multi Z
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
