Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 5 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Michelin Primacy 5 has a better rating of 82% compared to 69% of the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The first tyre test of Michelin Primacy 5 was done in 2025, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin Primacy 5 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (75%) of the Kumho Ecsta HS52 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Primacy 5
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 5 Test winner2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Michelin Primacy 5 Recommended
