Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 5 Premium2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium3. Michelin e.Primacy Premium4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Michelin Primacy 5 Test winner3. Michelin e.Primacy Very good4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Michelin Primacy 5 Recommended3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended4. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,6 | 1,8 | 1,7 | |||
| Michelin Primacy 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,2 | 1,8 | 3,2 | |||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 3,3 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 2,7 | 3,1 | 2,7 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9.1 | ||||||
| Michelin Primacy 5 Rating: Test winner | 9.1 | ||||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 8.4 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
