Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Michelin Primacy 4 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Primacy 4 and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 54% of Michelin Primacy 4 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Primacy 4 is made - Spain/Germany/Poland.
# | Michelin Primacy 4
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R23 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 247 | 127 | 120 | ||||
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 199 | 77 | 122 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 277 | 142 | 135 | ||||
Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: - | 252 | 118 | 134 | ||||
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 235 | 114 | 121 | ||||
Show test details |