Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 | 36,2 | 29,3 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
