• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Vredestein ULTRAC

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

General comparison
premium
Michelin Primacy 4

Primacy 4

R14 - R23
137 Sizes
20 Tests
Best: #1
Worst: #8
Avg: 3.5
Latest: 2022
Best rating: Highly recommended
Worst rating: Recommended
upper-middle
Kumho Ecsta HS52

Ecsta HS52

74%
R14 - R20
44 Sizes
10 Tests
Best: #2
Worst: #13
Avg: 6.0
Latest: 2026
Best rating: Good
upper-middle
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

67%
R14 - R22
96 Sizes
23 Tests
Best: #2
Worst: #15
Avg: 6.6
Latest: 2025
Best rating: Exemplary
Worst rating: doporučení cena/výkon
premium
Vredestein ULTRAC

ULTRAC

16%
R15 - R21
69 Sizes
16 Tests
Best: #2
Worst: #20
Avg: 7.3
Latest: 2025
Best rating: Highly recommended
Worst rating: Sufficient

Tests used in comparison (1)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2022 215/55 R17 View

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Michelin Primacy 4
74%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
87%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Wet Braking
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
96%
Vredestein ULTRAC
96%
Best: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 (96.0%)
Wet Handling
Michelin Primacy 4
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Best: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (96.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Michelin Primacy 4
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
88%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Best: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (96.0%)
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
95%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Aquaplaning Cross
Michelin Primacy 4
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
87%
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Best: Debica Presto UHP2 (96.0%)
Best in category: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (90.2%)
Dry Performance
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
82%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Vredestein ULTRAC
77%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Dry Braking
Michelin Primacy 4
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Best: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 (90.0%)
Dry Handling
Michelin Primacy 4
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
84%
Vredestein ULTRAC
75%
Best: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 (92.0%)
Best in category: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 (91.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
81%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Noise Exterior
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
57%
Best: Continental EcoContact 6 (95.0%)
Ride Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
86%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Best: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (86.0%)
Best in category: Continental EcoContact 6 (90.5%)
Economy
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Kumho Ecsta HS52
64%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
52%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Vredestein ULTRAC
49%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Rolling Resistance
Michelin Primacy 4
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
42%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Best: Continental EcoContact 6 (100.0%)
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 4
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
61%
Vredestein ULTRAC
38%
Best: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (100.0%)
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (96.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison