• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Continental EcoContact 6

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (3)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2022 215/55 R17 View
ADAC ADAC
Summer
2022 185/65 R15 View
ADAC ADAC
Summer
2020 235/55 R17 View

Let's dive into a comparison between two acclaimed tyres: the Michelin Primacy 4 and the Continental EcoContact 6. Both are summer tyres widely recognized for their performance and quality.


Firstly, the Michelin Primacy 4, which earned an impressive 89% on our rating scale, distinguishes itself in the category of touring tyres. Manufactured in Spain, Germany, and Poland, this model was a successor to the Michelin Primacy 3 and has subsequently been replaced by the Michelin Primacy 4+. Performance-wise, it excelled in different tests, ranking first in the ADAC test and eighth in the Autobild test, both out of numerous competitors.


The Michelin Primacy 4 boasts impressive handling in dry conditions, superior comfort, and braking stability. Its other strong features include excellent aquaplaning reserves and high mileage. The only noted downside is its high price point. You can learn more about Michelin tyres here.


On the flip side, the Continental EcoContact 6, a German-made tyre, earned a rating of 63%. As a direct replacement for the Continental ContiEcoContact 5, the EcoContact 6 has now been superseded by the Continental EcoContact 7. This tyre had mixed rankings in the tests - it secured 23rd place in the Autobild contest out of 51 participants, but only managed seventh in the Autozeitung test out of 10 runners.


It has a solid reputation for low exterior noise, rolling resistance, and comfort, backed by short dry-braking distances and excellent mileage. However, it falls short in terms of aquaplaning reserves, wet-braking distances, and steering response. The manufacturer of this tyre, Continental, can be found here.


In conclusion, the Michelin Primacy 4 tends to outperform the Continental EcoContact 6 in several key performance areas despite its higher cost. However, each tyre has its unique strengths, making the choice largely dependent on personal preference and specific requirements.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Michelin Primacy 4
79%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Continental
EcoContact 6
Wet Braking
Michelin Primacy 4
85%
Continental EcoContact 6
65%
Wet Handling
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Wet Circle Cornering
Michelin Primacy 4
79%
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Michelin Primacy 4
85%
Continental EcoContact 6
65%
Aquaplaning Cross
Michelin Primacy 4
65%
Continental EcoContact 6
44%
Best: Debica Presto UHP2 (96.0%)
Best in category: Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun (87.4%)
Dry Performance
Michelin Primacy 4
90%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Continental EcoContact 6
67%
Continental
EcoContact 6
Dry Braking
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Continental EcoContact 6
82%
Dry Handling
Michelin Primacy 4
92%
Continental EcoContact 6
51%
Best in category: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 (94.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Continental
EcoContact 6
Noise Exterior
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Continental EcoContact 6
82%
Noise Interior
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Ride Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
Best in category: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 (86.0%)
Economy
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Continental EcoContact 6
96%
Continental
EcoContact 6
Rolling Resistance
Michelin Primacy 4
92%
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Fuel Efficiency
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Continental EcoContact 6
98%
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 4
92%
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (96.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison