Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin Primacy 3 and Nokian Line SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Firmenauto 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Primacy 3 and the Line SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Michelin Primacy 3 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Nokian Line SUV also have A wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Primacy 3
| Nokian Line SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Exemplary2. Nokian Line SUV Good
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Michelin Primacy 3 Recommended
1. Michelin Primacy 3 71 dB
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Michelin Primacy 3 Rating: Good | 8,4 | 9,6 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 9,0 | 7,9 | 7 | 8 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||