Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Michelin Primacy 3 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2018 235/45 R18 test, where both the Primacy 3 and the Ecsta PS71 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Michelin Primacy 3 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Primacy 3
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
1. Michelin Primacy 3 71 dB
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 150 | 55 | 39 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Michelin Primacy 3 Rating: Recommended | 136 | 57 | 45 | 17 | 8 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Recommended | 149 | 67 | 44 | 14 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||