Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium4. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle5. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Primacy 3 vs. Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good4. Nokian Line SUV Good5. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended3. Michelin Primacy 3 Recommended4. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 3 71 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Michelin Primacy 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
