Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 has a better rating of 95% compared to 78% of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72). The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was done in 2022, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Die Reifentester 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Pilot Sport 5 and the Ecsta Sport (PS72) were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Michelin Pilot Sport 5 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) also have A wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 5
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Test winner2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good
2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||