• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (3)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2025 225/40 R18 View
ACE ACE
Summer
2023 225/45 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2023 225/45 R18 View

Let us compare two summer tyres: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and Kumho Ecsta PS71. From Michelin, the Pilot Sport 5 is an Ultra Ultra High Performance (UUHP) tyre that offers an exceptionally high level of performance with our rating at 96%. This model was preceded by the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and 3, and has no current successor.


On the other hand, we have the Kumho Ecsta PS71 from Kumho, a summer tyre with our rating at 76%, without any mentioned previous models or subsequent replacements.


Test results from AutoBild rank the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 at position 6/50, offering mileage and excellent wet braking as its peak features. The Kumho Ecsta PS71 ranks 12/50, demonstrating excellent reserve capacity at aquaplaning, comfort, wet braking, and handling as its top characteristics.


Further data from AutoBild 2025 indicates that the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 demonstrates dynamic handling and short braking distances on wet and dry tracks as well as excellent mileage. On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 shines with efficient aquaplaning features and safe dynamics, and short braking distances.


ADAC ranks the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 at position 3/18 while the Kumho Ecsta PS71 ranks 13/18. ACE rankings are similar with Pilot Sport 5 at 3/10, primarily for its cross aquaplaning feature, and the Ecsta PS71 at 7/10 for its longitudinal aquaplaning attribute.


ACE 2023 analysis concludes that Michelin Pilot Sport 5 offers precise steering and outstanding driving dynamics, string aquaplaning reserves, and short wet and dry braking distances. Its top drawback appears to be its high price. Meanwhile, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 comes with a high perfomance potential, good handling, short wet and dry braking distances and proves to be price-friendly. The cons include a slightly higher driving noise.


Overall, while the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stands as the better choice with its precise steering, dynamic drive and excellent mileage, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 proves to be a solid and cost-effective selection with its good handling and efficient aquaplaning features.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
82%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 5
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Wet Braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Best: Hankook Ventus Evo (95.0%)
Wet Handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
78%
Best: Falken Ziex ZE320 (96.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Aquaplaning Cross
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Best in category: Hankook Ventus Evo (86.0%)
Dry Performance
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
80%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 5
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Dry Braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry Handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Best: Pirelli P Zero PZ4 (96.0%)
Best in category: Yokohama Advan Sport V107 (89.5%)
Comfort & Noise
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
62%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 5
Kumho Ecsta PS71
49%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Noise Exterior
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
49%
Best: Giti GitiSport S2 (92.0%)
Best in category: Giti GitiSport S2 (92.0%)
Economy
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
88%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 5
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Rolling Resistance
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Mileage
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
68%
Best in category: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (87.4%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison