Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Premium2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Fulda SportControl 2
Table of contents:
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 5
| Fulda SportControl 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and the Fulda SportControl 2 are both highly rated summer tyres, but with different strengths and weaknesses. Both have been subjected to rigorous testing by prestigious institutions such as Autobild.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 5, successor of the popular Pilot Sport 3 and 4 models, is a top-rated UUHP (Ultra Ultra High-Performance) tyre with a 96% rating. This model excels in terms of mileage and wet braking, securing its sixth position in the Autobild’s comprehensive tyre test out of fifty models. In the Autobild 2025 review, it was praised for its "precise steering behaviour and excellent driving dynamics", and "good aquaplaning reserves", with only "high price" being cited as a downside. Regardless, these attributes underline the Michelin's dedication to quality and performance.
On the other hand, the Fulda SportControl 2, didn't perform quite as well. This summer tyre boasts a rating of 69%. It landed in the 18th spot in the Autobild’s tyre test. Some of the best attributes were "safe handling characteristics on wet road", with a lower price point also being mentioned as a plus point. However, reviewers pointed out a "prolonged wet braking distance" and "slightly delayed steering behavior" as downsides. Nevertheless, the Fulda SportControl 2 is a solid entry-level option, showcasing Fulda’s commitment to affordability without sacrificing safety.
In conclusion, both tyres are strong contenders in the summer tyres market. The Michelin’s price tag may be higher, but it also delivers superior performance, especially in wet conditions. Conversely, the Fulda SportControl 2 is a budget-friendly choice that still offers reliable performance and safety. Therefore, the choice between Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and Fulda SportControl 2 significantly hinge on your personal needs and budget preferences.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda SportControl 2 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Test winner
Worst rating in test
2. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | 33.5 | 27.7 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36.2 | 33.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Outstanding | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | 60.1 | 26 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 63.9 | 29 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
