Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs. Kumho Ecsta PS91
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport 4S was done in 2024, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS91 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 68% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4S dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (68%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS91 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
| Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R23 | R18 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
