Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Bridgestone (84%). The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport 4S was done in 2024, compared to 2021 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 265/35 R19 test, where both the Pilot Sport 4S and the Potenza Sport were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4S has B wet grip rating, whereas 83% of Bridgestone Potenza Sport has A rating.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R23 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||