18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Nexen N fera Sport

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Michelin Pilot Sport 4 /0%	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	Kumho Ecsta PS71 /83%	Nexen N fera Sport /84%

Dimensions	R16 - R21	R15 - R22	R16 - R22	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

In a head-to-head comparison between the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and the Continental PremiumContact 6, the features and performance of these two premium summer tyres provide a clear guide for consumers to make the right choice. Various tyre tests have spotlighted the strengths and weaknesses of both, with Michelin often outperforming Continental.

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores highly in almost all categories, with a 93% rating on our site. It consistently ranked high in mutual tests, outshining the Continental PremiumContact 6 in several areas. This tyre has excellent dry handling, comfort, and rolling resistance, as well as impressive aquaplaning management, both longitudally and cross. Its wet handling is also noteworthy - an attribute that deemed vital for summer tyres. However, the Pilot Sport 4 has now been replaced by the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.

In contrast, the Continental PremiumContact 6 - a touring subtype tyre - received an 87% rating from us. While this tyre does not match the Michelin's performance, it is praised for its dry braking, handling, mileage, and price to value ratio. Despite ranking lower in tests comparatively, it notably takes the crown in some, including ADAC's, where it was deemed better due to its outstanding mileage, wet braking, and handling. However, the tyre has visible weaknesses, particularly in aquaplaning safety reserves and is also now replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7.

It is essential to take into account that test results can vary based on factors like usage, driving conditions and personal preference. Both tyres, manufactured by Michelin and Continental respectively, have unique strengths and weaknesses. Consequently, the chosen tyre should align with the specific needs and preferences of the individual driver.

In conclusion, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 outperforms the Continental PremiumContact 6. However, the Continental tyre still presents a valid choice, especially for those prioritising mileage and value. It's worth noting that both these models have been replaced, so considering their successors could be a wise choice.

Segment

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle

4. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 183

4. Nexen N fera Sport 96

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 19x

3. Nexen N fera Sport 17x

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 1.

3. Nexen N fera Sport 1.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 7.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. Nexen N fera Sport 17.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 2.11

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

4. Nexen N fera Sport 9.29

Year of the last test

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

2. Nexen N fera Sport 2025

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 2022

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended

4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Highly recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Good

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

3. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4

87%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

82%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

82%

Nexen
N fera Sport

71%

Wet handling

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 89%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 81%

4. Nexen N fera Sport 60%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 90%

3. Nexen N fera Sport 83%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 78%

Wet braking

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 88%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 84%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

4. Nexen N fera Sport 83%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 87%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 85%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 77%

4. Nexen N fera Sport 73%

Wet circle cornering

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 79%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 71%

4. Nexen N fera Sport 55%

Wet side guide

1. Nexen N fera Sport 76%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 76%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 76%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 A

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

4. Nexen N fera Sport ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

85%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

78%

Nexen
N fera Sport

75%

Dry handling

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 97%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 93%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

4. Nexen N fera Sport 63%

Dry braking

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 92%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 92%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 89%

4. Nexen N fera Sport 84%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 92%

3. Nexen N fera Sport 80%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 92%

3. Nexen N fera Sport 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4

78%

Nexen
N fera Sport

76%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

66%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

64%

Exterior noise

1. Nexen N fera Sport 88%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 79%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 59%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 59%

Comfort

1. Nexen N fera Sport 80%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 79%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 71 dB

2. Nexen N fera Sport ?

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

84%

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4

74%

Nexen
N fera Sport

66%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

49%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 76%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 70%

3. Nexen N fera Sport 55%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 32%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 94%

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 84%

3. Nexen N fera Sport 62%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 53%

Price/value

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

2. Nexen N fera Sport 59%

3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 56%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 25%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 C

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C

4. Nexen N fera Sport ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 15 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	2+	1-
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Exemplary	2+	1-
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2+
Nexen N Fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Summer tyre test 2022 245/45 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact
Best values in test	9,0	9,7	9,4
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Good	7,2	8,3	8,3
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Very good	7,8	8,4	7,4
Nexen N Fera Sport Rating: Good	8,2	7,9	6,5
Show test details

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2021 225/40 R18

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	92	93	93
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Highly recommended	87	83	92
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Highly recommended	89	85	93
Nexen N fera Sport	74	63	85
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Summer tyre test 2020 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Comfort
Best values in test	9,4	9,3	10	10	10
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Very good	9,1	9,3	7	8	9
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Very good	8,1	9,1	7	6	7
Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory	5,8	8,2	6	10	10
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	1-	1
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Exemplary	1-	1-	2-
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	1-	1
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended	1	2	3-
Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Exemplary	2	1-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	32,1	28,7
Michelin Pilot Sport 4	32,1	29,8
Continental PremiumContact 6	33,2	30,2
Kumho Ecsta PS71	34,9	29
Nexen N fera Sport	33,2	30,9
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,7	1,3	2,8	2,0	1,6
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Good	2,0	1,9	2,9	2,0	1,9
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good	1,7	2,4	3,6	2,0	2,1
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	2,4	3,3	3,0	2,0
Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,2	3,1	2,0	1,9
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	1	1
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Exemplary	1	1	1-
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	1
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2-	3-
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2019 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	1-	1-
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Exemplary	2	2+
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	34,2	28,7
Michelin Pilot Sport 4	34,2	29,6
Continental PremiumContact 6	35,8	29,9
Kumho Ecsta PS71	37,1	31,6
Show test details

Automotorsport Summer tyre test 2018 225/45 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact
Best values in test	9,4	9,8	9,3	10
Michelin Pilot Sport 4	9,4	9,8	9,3	8,3
Continental PremiumContact 6	8,5	8,5	8,7	8,0
Show test details

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2018 225/45 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	280	149	131
Michelin Pilot Sport 4	280	149	131
Continental PremiumContact 6	263	137	126
Show test details

EVO Summer tyre test 2017 225/40 R18

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Comfort
Best values in test	308,2	41	29,5	85,6	17
Michelin Pilot Sport 4	308,2	56	41	90,6	22,5
Continental PremiumContact 6	296,8	49,5	36,5	94,5	22
Show test details

Automotorsport Summer tyre test 2017 245/45 R18

Name	Points total
Best values in test	9,4
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Highly recommended	9,4
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended	8,4
Show test details

Tyre Reviews Summer tyre test 2021 225/40 R18

Name
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Test winner
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended
Show test details

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Nexen N fera Sport

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands