Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. Pirelli SCORPION

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV and the Pirelli SCORPION are two top-of-the-line tyres by leading manufacturers, Michelin and Pirelli. In this review, we are going to delve into a detailed comparison of these two models based on various test results.

According to autobild test results from 2024 and 2025, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV stood out with its dynamic handling behavior, short stopping distances on asphalt, and excellent comfortability. The tyre showed great performance in both wet and dry conditions, limited only by a mediocre sand traction. Manufactured in Poland and Spain, it earned an impressive rating of 93% on our site, typically ranking 1st or 2nd in mutual tests and standing out with features like Aquaplaning - cross, Dry handling, Grass traction, Gravel traction, Sand traction, and Wet braking. However, there are currently no details on newer models that may have replaced this tyre.

On the other hand, the Pirelli SCORPION presented great traction on grass and mud, short dry braking paths, convincing rolling comfort, and fuel-saving rolling resistance, according to autobild tests. Despite these strengths, the tyre performance was somewhat hindered by slightly spongy handling behavior on dry tracks. This tyre generally ranked 3rd or 5th in mutual tests, showcasing strengths in Aquaplaning - longitudinal, Handling on gravel, Sand traction, Rolling resistance, Comfort, Exterior noise, and Mud traction. Unfortunately, we currently do not have an independent rating for this tyre model, and there are no available details on a possible upgraded model.

Verdict:

In conclusion, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV exhibits a well-rounded performance excelling in a various domains, including handling, braking, and traction. These elements combined with its exceptional ratings in various tests make it a top choice for any motorist seeking top-tier performance from their summer tyres.

While the Pirelli SCORPION didn't perform as well as the Michelin tyre in mutual tests, it displayed several noteworthy features. Specifically, its superior grass and mud traction and fuel-saving rolling resistance make it suitable for drivers who often have to navigate more challenging terrains or prioritize better fuel efficiency.