Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium4. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle6. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Exemplary3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
4. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Recommended6. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
