Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has a better rating of 97% compared to 83% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Pilot Sport 4 S and the Ecsta PS71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 62% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Pilot Sport 4 S is made - United States.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R23 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: - | 1 | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||