Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Bridgestone (84%). The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Potenza S001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Pilot Sport 4 S and the Potenza S001 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 62% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has A wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Bridgestone Potenza S001 has B rating. We also know where Pilot Sport 4 S is made - United States.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
| Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R23 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||