Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 3 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Yokohama (57%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin Pilot Sport 3 and Yokohama Advan Sport V105, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Pilot Sport 3 and the Advan Sport V105 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Michelin Pilot Sport 3 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 3
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R16 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 3 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 3 Satisfactory2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 3 Satisfactory2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,2 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,2 | 1,5 | 3,5 | 2,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 266,5 | 187,9 | 63,2 | 96,1 | ||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 3 | 98 | 289,6 | 191,6 | 72,1 | 98,9 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 96,1 | 290,2 | 193,3 | 63,2 | 98,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||