Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 3 Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 3 vs. Nokian zLine
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin Pilot Sport 3 and Nokian zLine, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Pilot Sport 3 and the zLine were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Michelin Pilot Sport 3 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian zLine also have A wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 3
| Nokian zLine
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Michelin Pilot Sport 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Michelin Pilot Sport 3 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,2 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
