Segment
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium2. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Premium4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary2. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Exemplary3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory3. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Satisfactory4. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Offroad
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Rating: Good | 2.0 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Rating: Test winner | 1 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
