Segment
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Kumho (63%). In this particular case, the Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 has a better rating of 100% compared to 87% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+. The first tyre test of Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 was done in 2020, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the PILOT ALPIN 5 and the WinterCraft WP52+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ also have B wet ratings. We also know where PILOT ALPIN 5 is made - France.
| # | Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | 33.2 | 27.8 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ | 33.5 | 28.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||