Segment
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR SUV 3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (80%) of the Nokian WR SUV 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R23 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Exemplary2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
