Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Premium2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 vs. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 was done in 2015, compared to 2023 when was the Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV has B rating.
| # | Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
| Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Test winner2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Satisfactory2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Sufficient
