Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Premium2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 vs. Kormoran SUV SNOW
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Kormoran (19%). The first tyre test of Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 was done in 2015, compared to 2025 when was the Kormoran SUV SNOW first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kormoran SUV SNOW also have C wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
| Kormoran SUV SNOW
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Test winner2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Satisfactory2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
