Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Bridgestone (87%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Latitude Alpin LA2 and the Blizzak LM-80 Evo were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo also have C wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Test winner2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 406 | 147 | 134 | 143 | |||
| Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Rating: Test winner | 406 | 143 | 120 | 143 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: - | 355 | 97 | 123 | 135 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||