Segment
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Norauto Prevensys 4 Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Norauto Prevensys 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Norauto). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Norauto (45%). In this particular case, the Michelin e.Primacy has a better rating of 71% compared to 45% of the Norauto Prevensys 4. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the e.Primacy and the Prevensys 4 were tested. We also know where e.Primacy is made - Italy/Spain/Germany.
| # | Michelin e.Primacy
| Norauto Prevensys 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin e.Primacy Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient2. Norauto Prevensys 4 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
| Norauto Prevensys 4 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 3,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
