• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Michelin e.Primacy has a better rating of 71% compared to 69% of the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The first tyre test of Michelin e.Primacy was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the e.Primacy and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin e.Primacy has B wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating. We also know where e.Primacy is made - Italy/Spain/Germany.

# Michelin e.Primacy
/71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
/69%

Add to comparison

Michelin
Kumho
DimensionsR15 - R21 R14 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

1

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,31,8
Michelin e.Primacy
Rating: Sufficient
1,3 3,9
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Rating: Good
2,72,3
Show test details