Segment
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Michelin e.Primacy has a better rating of 71% compared to 69% of the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The first tyre test of Michelin e.Primacy was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the e.Primacy and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin e.Primacy has B wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating. We also know where e.Primacy is made - Italy/Spain/Germany.
| # | Michelin e.Primacy
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
1. Michelin e.Primacy Very good2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||