Segment
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium3. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary3. Michelin e.Primacy Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended3. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
