Segment
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Firestone (69%). In this particular case, the Michelin e.Primacy has a better rating of 71% compared to 57% of the Firestone Roadhawk. The first tyre test of Michelin e.Primacy was done in 2023, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the e.Primacy and the Roadhawk were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin e.Primacy has B wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Firestone Roadhawk has A rating. We also know where e.Primacy is made - Italy/Spain/Germany.
| # | Michelin e.Primacy
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Michelin e.Primacy Very good
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended2. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||