Segment
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Premium3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Dunlop Sport BluResponse vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Exemplary2. Michelin e.Primacy Very good3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,6 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
