Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Vredestein (69%). The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate SUV was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Vredestein Quatrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/50 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate SUV and the Quatrac Pro were tested.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary
2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Michelin CrossClimate SUV Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||