Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate SUV vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Kumho (65%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate SUV has a better rating of 80% compared to 64% of the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate SUV was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S also have B wet ratings.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
