Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Hankook (82%). The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate SUV was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/50 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate SUV and the Kinergy 4S2 X H750A were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A also have B wet ratings.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R18 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Michelin CrossClimate SUV Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||