Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate SUV vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Hankook (82%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary
