Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than GoodYear (79%). The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate SUV was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/50 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate SUV and the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R19 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Michelin CrossClimate SUV Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||