• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 vs. Nexen N Blue 4 Season vs. Kumho Solus HA31

# Michelin CrossClimate+
/0%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
/52%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
/0%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
/0%
Kumho Solus HA31
/0%

Add to comparison

Michelin
Vredestein
Goodyear
Nexen
Kumho
DimensionsR13 - R19 R17 - R22 R13 - R20 R13 - R19 R13 - R18
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison



Today, we are comparing two all-around tyres: the Michelin CrossClimate+ and the Vredestein Quatrac Pro. Produced by Michelin and Vredestein respectively, these tyres are known for their high performance and versatility. However, there are notable differences between the two, as shown in a number of tests.


Michelin CrossClimate+



The Michelin CrossClimate+ scored an impressive 71% in our ratings. Excellent on dry handling and braking, this tyre particularly excels in snow handling and mileage. In the ADAC test, it ranked 3rd out of 7, and 2nd in the Autobild test amongst a field of 31 tyres. Its major strengths include Dry braking, Dry handling, Mileage, and Snow handling.


Vredestein Quatrac Pro



On the other hand, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro, manufactured in Hungary, scored 61% in our ratings. Quieter than its competitor, it's the tyre to choose if you value interior silence. However, the Quatrac Pro fell a bit short in handling and braking on dry surfaces and performed particularly poorly in snowy conditions. In the ADAC test, it took the 6th position out of 7, but performed better in the Autobild test with the 3rd position amongst 31 tyres. Some of the tyre's top features are Noise reduction, Snow traction, Wet braking, and Wet circle cornering.


Verdict



Overall, if you are looking for a high-performing tyre with strong mileage and excellent capabilities during dry and snowy conditions, choose the Michelin CrossClimate+. However, if noise reduction is your top priority and you mostly drive in wet conditions, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro might be the better choice. Keep in mind, however, that its overall performance falls below that of the CrossClimate+.

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

3

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,02,63,02,42,70,61,5
Michelin CrossClimate+
Rating: Sufficient
2,72,6 3,92,4 3,00,6 2,0
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Rating: Poor
2,63,95,22,72,7 1,02,5
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
Rating: Sufficient
2,63,83,62,4 2,81,01,9
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+2+1
Michelin CrossClimate+
Rating: Exemplary
22+ 2+ 1
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Rating: Exemplary
2+ 21-2-
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
Rating: Good
22-1-1-
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
Rating: Good
2-222+
Kumho Solus HA31
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2+ 22+
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,546,3
Michelin CrossClimate+39,948,6
Vredestein Quatrac Pro42,946,5
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-244,447,5
Nexen N Blue 4 Season42,350,4
Kumho Solus HA3143,849,5
Show test details