Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Premium2. Nokian Seasonproof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (63%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin CrossClimate+ and Nokian Seasonproof, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate+ was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian Seasonproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 215/60 R16 test, where both the CrossClimate+ and the Seasonproof were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Michelin CrossClimate+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Seasonproof also have B wet ratings.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate+
| Nokian Seasonproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Premium2. Nokian Seasonproof Upper-middle
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Exemplary2. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory
1. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory2. Michelin CrossClimate+ Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Michelin CrossClimate+ Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian Seasonproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||