Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 3 Premium2. Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Ultra Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs. Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Ultra
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Sailun). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Sailun (49%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 3 has a better rating of 66% compared to 51% of the Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Ultra. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate 3 and the Atrezzo 4Seasons Ultra were tested.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate 3
| Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Ultra
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 3 Rating: Good | 1- | 2- | 2 | 1– | |||
| Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Ultra Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2- | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
