Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 3 Premium2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs. Linglong Sport Master 4S
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Linglong (60%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 3 has a better rating of 66% compared to 61% of the Linglong Sport Master 4S. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate 3 and the Sport Master 4S were tested.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate 3
| Linglong Sport Master 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 3 Rating: Good | 1- | 2- | 2 | 1– | |||
| Linglong Sport Master 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
