Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 3 Premium
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than GoodYear (79%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 has a better rating of 79% compared to 66% of the Michelin CrossClimate 3. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate 3 was done in 2025, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate 3 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate 3
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner
Worst rating in test
2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
