Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Premium
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac
Table of contents:
| # | Michelin CrossClimate 2
| Vredestein Quatrac
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When it comes to all-round tyres, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and the Vredestein Quatrac are two models that might come into consideration. Both are manufactured by renowned companies, each with a long-standing reputation for quality and performance.
Michelin CrossClimate 2
The Michelin CrossClimate 2, made in Italy and Spain, is the successor of the well-regarded Michelin CrossClimate. Our rating for this model is 93%, making it a top contender in the category. In the AUTOBILD and ADAC tyre tests, the CrossClimate 2 secured fourth place out of 37 and 16 tyres, respectively. The tyre is noted to have excelled in dry braking, snow braking, and snow handling in multiple tests by TyreReviews.com, displaying particularly impressive grip in the dry, resistance to aquaplaning and snow traction. Yet it reveals some room for improvement in wet braking and handling.
Vredestein Quatrac
The Vredestein Quatrac, made in Hungary, garnered an 88% rating from us, positioning it as a strong competitor in the all-round tyre segment. In the AUTOBILD and ADAC tyre tests, the Quatrac snagged the fifth and sixth positions out of all tyres, respectively. According to the TyreReviews website summary, the Quatrac exhibited good dry braking and handling, competent performance in snow, and was especially powerful around the wet handling lap. To balance this, it had an average performance in wet and snow braking, and higher than average rolling resistance.
Considering the test results, these tyres have both unique strengths and weaknesses. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 stands out for its superior dry and snow capabilities but falls short in wet conditions. On the contrary, the Vredestein Quatrac shines in wet conditions, but has room for improvement in dry and snow situations.
In conclusion, selecting between these two high-eminent tyres may depend on your specific driving conditions and preferences. For dry and predominantly snowy conditions, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 may be the better choice. Conversely, if you often drive in wet conditions, the Vredestein Quatrac could provide better performance.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.9 | 56.4 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.2 | 55.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | ||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.2 | 3.1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.7 | 47 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 45.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 39,9 | 49,2 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 41,7 | 47,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 1- | 3 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Test winner | 1 | ||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
