Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Falken EuroALL Season AS220 Pro Upper-middle3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle4. Nexen N Blue 4 Season 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS220 Pro vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Nexen N Blue 4 Season 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner3. Nexen N Blue 4 Season 2 Satisfactory4. Falken EuroALL Season AS220 Pro Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
3. Nexen N Blue 4 Season 2 Satisfactory4. Falken EuroALL Season AS220 Pro Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.7 | 47 | |||||
| Falken EuroAll Season AS220 Pro | 39.8 | 46 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 38.3 | 48.5 | |||||
| Nexen N Blue 4 Season 2 | 39.2 | 48.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS220 Pro Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Nexen N Blue 4 Season 2 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
