Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Premium3. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Pirelli Cinturato Winter vs. Nokian WR D4
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.882. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Highly recommended3. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended3. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
3. Nokian WR D4 67%
Aquaplaning - cross
3. Nokian WR D4 77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
3. Nokian WR D4 75%
Wet braking
3. Nokian WR D4 73%
Wet circle cornering
3. Nokian WR D4 70%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 95%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 97%
Snow braking
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Michelin Alpin 5 100%2. Nokian WR D4 79%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR D4 79%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
7
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 1- | 3- | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,0 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 1,0 | 2,4 |
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 3,5 | 2,1 | 2,3 | 3,2 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 37,1 | 28,4 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter | 35,9 | 27,4 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 27,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 96,9 | 99,8 | 99 | 100 | 100 | |
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 98,5 | 88,2 | 97 | 98,8 | 88,7 | 98,4 | |
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter | 99,3 | 93,4 | 98,35 | 97,9 | 85,5 | 98,7 | |
| Nokian WR D4 | 99,7 | 96,9 | 99,5 | 99 | 85,1 | 97,9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 35,6 | 25,8 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter | 36,2 | 26,4 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 412 | 142 | 127 | 143 | 25 | 10 | |
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 376 | 128 | 108 | 140 | 18 | 8 | |
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: Highly recommended | 378 | 138 | 101 | 139 | 15 | 9 | |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Highly recommended | 387 | 124 | 121 | 142 | 21 | 8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
