18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Michelin Alpin 5 /0%	Nokian WR D4 /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R21	R13 - R20	R13 - R17	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

4. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Michelin Alpin 5 91

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

4. Nokian WR D4 82

Number of tests

1. Nokian WR D4 26x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

3. Michelin Alpin 5 17x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. Nokian WR D4 2.

2. Michelin Alpin 5 2.

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Nokian WR D4 14.

2. Michelin Alpin 5 17.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88

2. Nokian WR D4 6.04

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

3. Michelin Alpin 5 2018

4. Nokian WR D4 2018

Best rating in test

1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

3. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Nokian WR D4 Recommended

3. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

79%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Nokian
WR D4

70%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Michelin Alpin 5 86%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 82%

3. Nokian WR D4 74%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 84%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 73%

3. Nokian WR D4 73%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 78%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

3. Nokian WR D4 69%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 79%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 78%

3. Nokian WR D4 64%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Michelin Alpin 5 83%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 77%

3. Nokian WR D4 75%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet performance

1. Michelin Alpin 5 79%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 73%

3. Nokian WR D4 66%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Michelin Alpin 5 B

2. Nokian WR D4 B

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

86%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Nokian
WR D4

79%

Dry performance

1. Michelin Alpin 5 86%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 81%

3. Nokian WR D4 79%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Dry braking

1. Nokian WR D4 85%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 81%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 79%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Dry driving behavior

1. Michelin Alpin 5 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 77%

3. Nokian WR D4 75%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

94%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Michelin
Alpin 5

69%

Snow traction

1. Nokian WR D4 93%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 78%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 68%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

85%

Michelin
Alpin 5

83%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Mileage

1. Michelin Alpin 5 94%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 78%

3. Nokian WR D4 65%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Nokian WR D4 90%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 74%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WR D4 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

4. Michelin Alpin 5 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

74%

Nokian
WR D4

72%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

71%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Exterior noise

1. Nokian WR D4 69%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 65%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 64%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Interior noise

1. Nokian WR D4 70%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 70%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 66%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Nokian WR D4 ?

3. Michelin Alpin 5 ?

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

80%

Michelin
Alpin 5

78%

Ice braking

1. Nokian WR D4 86%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 81%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 78%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 81%

2. Nokian WR D4 80%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 14 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2	3	1
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	1	2
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	2	2	1-	1-
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,8	2,3	3,0	1,0	1,7
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	2,0	2,7	2,5	3,6	1,0	2,4
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	2,9	2,5	1,8	2,5	3,4	3,0	1,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Michelin Alpin 5	37,1	28,4
Nokian WR D4	37,3	27,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	34,9	27,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2+
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2-	2	3+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Michelin Alpin 5	33,3	28,7
Nokian WR D4	35	27,7
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	35,9	28,6
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2017 225/45 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	100
Michelin Alpin 5	97,5
Nokian WR D4	98
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	99,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	96,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 215/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,9	2,3	3,1	0,5	1,4
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	2,1	2,7	2,5	3,8	0,5	2,3
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,5	1,9	2,5	3,4	2,5	2,0
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	3,3	2,0	2,1	2,5	3,6	1,5	2,1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,7	1,7	2,1	3,0	1,5	1,7
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2,5	2,1	3,2	2,6	3,5	1,5	2,6
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	2,3	1,7	2,4	3,6	3,0	1,9
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	2,6	2,2	2,7	2,5	3,7	2,5	2,2
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	100	96,9	99,8	99	100	100
Michelin Alpin 5	98,5	88,2	97	98,8	88,7	98,4
Nokian WR D4	99,7	96,9	99,5	99	85,1	97,9
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	97,6	92,1	99,6	95,9	86,1	99,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	98,4	95,6	96	94,9	85,6	99,8
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	101	100	103,3	100,3
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Very good	100	100	100	100
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Good	99,3	97,4	100,5	99,9
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	96,2	90,3	99,4	98,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	98,6	98,3	98,9	98,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: -	2+	2	1-	2
Nokian WR D4 Rating: -	2	2-	2+	2-
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Michelin Alpin 5	35,6	25,8
Nokian WR D4	37,3	26,0
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	39,1	26,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Show test details

GTÜ Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	412	142	127	143	25	10
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Highly recommended	376	128	108	140	18	8
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Highly recommended	387	124	121	142	21	8
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Highly recommended*	363	104	118	141	16	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	341	100	114	127	19	8
Show test details

GTÜ Winter tyre test 2015 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	205	64	70	46	18	8
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Recommended	195	61	67	41	16	6
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended	193	63	58	45	18	3
Show test details

Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands