Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle4. Semperit Speed-Grip 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Semperit Speed-Grip 3 Exemplary2. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended3. Semperit Speed-Grip 3 Sufficient4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 37,1 | 28,4 | |||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,2 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,1 | 3,2 | 2,6 | 3,5 | 1,5 | 2,6 |
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | 3,1 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
| Show test details | |||||||
