12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Michelin Alpin 5 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%

Dimensions	R15 - R21	R14 - R22	R16 - R22	R14 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Michelin Alpin 5 91

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

4. Michelin Alpin 5 17x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

4. Michelin Alpin 5 2.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

4. Michelin Alpin 5 17.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

4. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

4. Michelin Alpin 5 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

3. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 83%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 74%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 77%

Wet performance

1. Michelin Alpin 5 79%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Michelin Alpin 5 B

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

86%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Dry performance

1. Michelin Alpin 5 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 80%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

Dry driving behavior

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 91%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Michelin
Alpin 5

69%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 68%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 71%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

Snow performance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 59%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 71%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

84%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Mileage

1. Michelin Alpin 5 96%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Fuel efficiency

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 75%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 0%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 68%

Price/value

1. Michelin Alpin 5 97%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

4. Michelin Alpin 5 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

80%

Michelin
Alpin 5

72%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 63%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 67%

Comfort

1. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Michelin Alpin 5 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 78%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 0%

Ice braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands