12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Michelin Alpin 5 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R21	R14 - R21	R13 - R23
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. Michelin Alpin 5 91

Number of tests

1. Michelin Alpin 5 17x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. Michelin Alpin 5 2.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin Alpin 5 17.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

3. Michelin Alpin 5 2018

Best rating in test

1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

79.2%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79.6%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Michelin Alpin 5 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

84.3%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

83.9%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Michelin
Alpin 5

72.1%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70.5%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

79.4%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

78.6%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Michelin Alpin 5 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

72.2%

Michelin
Alpin 5

65.6%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

3. Michelin Alpin 5 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80.7%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79.3%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 9 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2+	1-
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	2	2+	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Michelin Alpin 5	33,3	28,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2017 225/45 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	100
Michelin Alpin 5	97,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	96,9
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	100	96,9	99,8	99	100	100
Michelin Alpin 5	98,5	88,2	97	98,8	88,7	98,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	98,4	95,6	96	94,9	85,6	99,8
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	101	100	103,3	100,3
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Very good	100	100	100	100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	98,6	98,3	98,9	98,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: -	2+	2	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Michelin Alpin 5	35,6	25,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Show test details

GTÜ Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	412	142	127	143	25	10
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Highly recommended	376	128	108	140	18	8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	341	100	114	127	19	8
Show test details

Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands